I aim to reduce the complexity of self-evaluation for key moments, goals, habits, and tasks in incarcerated individuals. Beyond supporting individuals in prison, this system is meant for anyone bold enough to pursue extreme personal change — those ready to face the cost of becoming someone new. To achieve this, the System that enables discontinuous self-assessment based on the 8 Prime Identities model.

General Vision

This system is designed to support individuals navigating critical life shifts with a willingness to transform to assess and improve their psychological well-being through:

  • Identification of key moments (high/low motivation and satisfaction)

     
  • Classification using the 8 Identities model

     
  • Definition of personalized goals, habits, and tasks

     
  • Continuous tracking of progress

     

Model Overview:
 8 Prime Identities – LessWrong

 


 

Core System Components

  • Definition of 4 reference moments (high/low motivation and satisfaction)

     
  • Gradual definition of goals, habits, and tasks

     
  • Daily self-assessment prompts for new significant moments

     
  • Weighting system for moments and contributing factors

     
  • Classification system according to the 8 identities

     
  • XP (experience points) reward system

     

 


 

Level 1: Foundation

Phase 1 – Defining Reference Moments (4 weeks, 1h/week)

The user answers 4 key questions about moments with high variation in motivation or satisfaction. These can also be pre-filled during an onboarding assessment.

#

State

Trigger

Focus (Int/Ext)

Factor Type (Social / Info / Indiv / Physical)

Title (2-word)

1

High motivation

...

...

...

...

2

Low motivation

...

...

...

...

3

High satisfaction

...

...

...

...

4

Low satisfaction

...

...

...

...

Each reference moment is evaluated with:

  • What led to this moment that could help you repeat it?

     
  • Was the focus more personal or environmental?

     
  • Was it more social, informational, individual, or physical?

     
  • The app proposes a matching identity (from the 8).

     
  • User gives it a 2-word title.

     

Initial Weights:

  • High motivation/satisfaction: 1.0

     
  • Low motivation/satisfaction: 0.01
     

 

Phase 2 – Defining Goals, Habits, and Tasks (3 weeks, 1h/week)

Week 1: Goals
 “What 4 goals could help you repeat/improve the positive moments and avoid the negative ones?”
 → For each goal: identify which identities it strengthens.

Week 2: Habits
 “What 4 daily or weekly habits could help you reach these goals?”
 → Classify each by the identity it supports.

Week 3: Tasks
 “What 4 concrete tasks can move you toward your goals?”
 → Assign each to a related identity.

 


 

Phase 3 – Ongoing Self-Evaluation of New Key Moments

  • “Since last time, have you experienced moments of high or low motivation/satisfaction?”

     
  • “Describe the moment briefly.”

     
  • App analyzes and decomposes into factors.

     
  • For each factor: “How much did this contribute to the moment?” (scale 1–100)

     
  • App classifies according to identity model.

     

Reference Comparison System:

Compared to reference

Result

New weight

Previous reference weight

Much higher

Replace

1.0

0.33

Higher

Replace

1.0

0.5

Slightly higher

Replace

1.0

0.66

Lower

Keep reference

(Reverse weights for negative moments range from 0.01 to 0.1)

 


 

XP System (Experience Points)

  • Much higher/lower: +1 XP

     
  • Higher/lower: +0.75 XP

     
  • Slightly higher/lower: +0.5 XP

     
  • A bit higher/lower: +0.25 XP

     

 

Review System

  • After a reference change: “Would you like to update your goals?”

     
  • If yes: “Would you like to update your habits?”

     

 

Reports and Visualizations

  • Moment distribution by identity

     
  • Progress on goals, habits, and tasks

     
  • Motivation/satisfaction trends

     
  • Most/least developed identities
     

 

Level 2: Objective Metrics and Validation

  • Dynamic threshold: 75th percentile of previous records = “high”

     
  • Advanced phase: passive sensors (steps, HRV, HR) to compare self-reports

     
  • AI always asks for user confirmation on confidence of data

 

🧩 Invitation to Collaborate

If this project resonates with you —whether you're a developer interested in using technology for psychological empowerment, or a rationalist passionate about designing systems that reduce bias and increase agency— I'd love to collaborate.

For developers:
 Your skills could help turn this into a robust, elegant, privacy-respecting tool that can work even offline and adapt to the constraints of a prison environment. Whether you have experience with Flutter, or just love building systems that actually help people, there's space for you here.

For rationalists:
 This framework is heavily inspired by Bayesian thinking, entropy-based identity modeling, and meta-rationality. I'm looking for feedback, criticisms, and contributions to refine the identity model, scoring systems, or behavior tracking logic. Especially if you're into cognitive science, applied rationality, or system design — your insights are extremely welcome.

🔗 Where to start:
 I’m preparing a GitHub repo and lightweight onboarding materials (data model, design principles, UI wireframes). If you'd like to be part of this, just message me or comment on this draft — I’ll follow up with access and next steps.

🌱 Why this matters:
 People in prison often lack tools for introspection, self-guided growth, and feedback loops that don’t depend on external authority. Helping someone reflect more clearly on their motivations and priorities — even once a week — can shift their trajectory. Let’s build something that respects their autonomy while supporting their development.

New Comment
Curated and popular this week