Links and tweets, 2022-05-30

by Jason Crawford · May 30, 2022 · 1 min read

Trying a new experiment: a blog-post digest of my most relevant Twitter content. Let me know any feedback!

Links

• Our World in Data is looking for a Head of Product & Design
• Dan Elton is hosting a “Boston area progress studies roundtable discussion”
• “The FDA has a long, long history of just hating people testing themselves.”
• Matthew Dockrey reads the Philosophical Transactions and makes a video for each one
• Misha Chellam on “broad YIMBYism.” And: “Small-d democratic-citizen participation has led to profoundly regressive outcomes.” (via @hanlonbt)

Tweets

• A thread on the history of wheels and steering (I will probably blog this soon)
• We could use more blog posts summarizing and explaining academic papers
• Why we can’t have solar-powered cargo ships
• There is a pessimist argument that basically goes: “Yes, in the past, we invented many things. But, we cannot invent those things again.”
• Bacon on defeatism vs. progress
• Before the car was a “horseless carriage,” the telephone was a “speaking telegraph”
• Telegraph-based stock tickers were the “infinite scroll” of the 19th century
• Norman Borlaug’s gift to the world
• The proper attitude for university students according to Jacob Bronowski
• Vannevar Bush: “any well-conducted laboratory” has an atmosphere that “almost wholly banishes posing, jockeying for position, and evasiveness”
• Our health organizations are not set up to deal with pandemics

Retweets

• Examples of graphs like this for other technologies? (@eric_is_weird)

• If we don’t get a New Roaring ’20s, what went wrong? (@JimPethokoukis)
• Adversarial legalism is why we can’t build things anymore in the US (@AlecStapp)
• “To don a pair of eyeglasses was to cheat old age” (@krisgulati)
• James Watt and Adam Smith met in Glasgow as young men (@dkedrosky)
• The world is a museum of passion projects (@collision)
• Let’s stop saying “there is no evidence for X” and instead say “we are still gathering evidence to know whether X is true”. (@Ayjchan) (@zeynep agrees)
• One of the motivations for Nature was speed of communication. Another was establishing early credit. Today, that sounds like preprints (@NeuroStats)
• Von Neumann had an interesting style of dealing with people (@curiouswavefn)

Comment: Progress Forum, LessWrong, Reddit