Took every quote posted in this thread so far and Markov-ised it. (Depth of 1, i.e., each word only depends on the word before it. A depth of 2 basically regurgitates the input in this case.)

Here are some of the results:

"How do you regenerate that beat Reedspacer's Lower Bound?"

"It's a more karma. I interpreted your map, not a group you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide."

"Look, just generalize from halo effect."

"Okay, but in this is rational under them to make six figures as a cult."

"Beliefs are just an inferential distance and my belief is the territory."

"That's just a survey should do you measure, not throw all the scientific knowledge a dissolved question."

"Any organization with the teacher's password."

"That's just rejecting religion and closely guarded secret, so it but there's no idea how BIG thingspace is."

"Foo is the karma system more likely."

"You make six figures as a thousand shards of inferential distance and I cooperate."

"Conceptspace is white."

"Go ahead and only if and it's objective, but I think he's just what the Nazis did!"

"There's a Philosophy professor about definitions."

"I might write rationalist fanfiction of the other person will cooperate if snow is no context."

"Mysteriousness is true rejection?"

"I'd say politically incorrect about it before proposing solutions?"

"Arguments are you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide."

"I have to suppress dissent."

"Of course I wanna be the universe with rationality?"

"Money is an argument about my belief that one of a rationalist."

"I pattern matched what you know the Society for link me to a startup, I think of any more elaborate."

"'Snow is being used to say 'purpose'."

[anonymous]8y1

Awesome.

6MixedNuts8yFrequentists for infanticide [https://plus.google.com/b/109523452716660210885/109523452716660210885/posts]! (I hope nobody takes this seriously. I mean, ew. Who'd support such horrible statistics?)

Shit Rationalists Say?

by Eneasz 1 min read25th Jan 2012120 comments

36


I assume everyone has run across at least one of the "Shit X's Say" format of videos? Such as Shit Skeptics Say. When done right it totally triggers the in-group warm-fuzzies. (Not to be confused with the nearly-identically formatted "Shit X's Say to Y's" which is mainly a way for Y's to complain about X's).

What sort of things do Rationalists often say that triggers this sort of in-group recognition which could be popped into a short video? A few I can think of...

You should sign up for cryonics. I want to see you in the future.

…intelligence explosion…

What’s your confidence interval?

You know what they say: one man’s Modus Ponens is another man’s Modus Tollens

This may sound a bit crazy right now, but hear me out…

What are your priors?

When the singularity comes that won’t be a problem anymore.

I like to think I’d do that, but I don’t fully trust myself. I am running on corrupted hardware after all.

I want to be with you, and I don’t foresee that changing in the near future.

…Bayesian statistics…

So Omega appears in front of you…

What would you say the probability of that event is, if your beliefs are true?

 

Others?