I was going to say about how I'm sorry, didn't mean any insult, how I saw and heard some evidence for that judgment around here before... but ah, screw it, everyone can plainly see that I'm trying to act like an RPG hero, negotiating conflicts with the most authority and Deep Wisdom that his (my) dialogue options allow. ;)

I fully admit to being schizotypal by nature, leaning towards schizoaffective. So do take that into account. But I too have taken into account.

Interestingly, part of the definition of schizophrenia has been manipulated by intelligence agencies. Don't take my word of course, look it up. If I recall specifically the parts about conspiracies at least. But I didn't look closely into the issue. It's not incredibly relevant.

4CommanderShepard8yYou need more paragon points before that will work.

This post is for sacrificing my credibility!

by Will_Newsome 1 min read2nd Jun 2012347 comments

-30


Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. Don't worry, there won't be future posts like this, so you don't have to delete my LessWrong account, and anyway I could make another, and another.

But since you've dared to read this far:

Credibility. Should you maximize it, or minimize it? Have I made an error?

Discuss.

Don't be shallow, don't just consider the obvious points. Consider that I've thought about this for many, many hours, and that you don't have any privileged information. Whence our disagreement, if one exists?