Entirely? I wouldn't think that was the case, I guess. Do you mean in the sense that the goodness of jumping off a cliff depends entirely on your goals? (The analogy is carefully chosen—many people regard suicide and social suicide similarly.)

If you're trying to discredit an idea, pretend to espouse it, while undermining your own credibility.

If you're trying to support an idea, attack it while undermining your own credibility.

If you're trying to "keep people on their toes," occasionally say wrong things, but don't lead people to expect that nothing you say is trustworthy or folks will just ignore you.

If you're trying to become a respected academic, engineer, or businessperson, protect your credibility.

If you are trying to keep people from finding something out, lose your credibility as badly as possible, and then publicly say the thing you're trying to hide.

Etc. So what are your goals?

This post is for sacrificing my credibility!

by Will_Newsome 1 min read2nd Jun 2012347 comments

-30


Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. Don't worry, there won't be future posts like this, so you don't have to delete my LessWrong account, and anyway I could make another, and another.

But since you've dared to read this far:

Credibility. Should you maximize it, or minimize it? Have I made an error?

Discuss.

Don't be shallow, don't just consider the obvious points. Consider that I've thought about this for many, many hours, and that you don't have any privileged information. Whence our disagreement, if one exists?