Given that one of the best ways to tell a deliberate lie is to believe it, I can understand why good liars often end up convincing themselves.

For that matter, it's a technique that I think I've personally used to change my own beliefs, for the saner. (If that's not confusing, you're either not working or have information I haven't shared.)

Well, I understood you to mean that there are beliefs you currently have, that at one time you did not have, and you suspect that the way you managed the transition was by lying about your beliefs and coming to believe your own lies, and you endorse your current beliefs as saner than your previous beliefs.

I did not experience much confusion parsing it, though it is of course possible I misunderstood.

[SEQ RERUN] Protected From Myself

by MinibearRex 1 min read27th Sep 201211 comments


Today's post, Protected From Myself was originally published on 19 October 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):


Ethics can protect you from your own mistakes, especially when your mistakes are about really fundamental things.

Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).

This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Dark Side Epistemology, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.

Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.