Worthless ranting.

His footnote 3 is particularly telling:

I am indebted to the rationalwiki page on lesswrong for much of the information in this and subsequent sections.

In other words, this is soup of the soup.

Looking at the other articles on his site, they're all like that. I would say that this is someone who does not know how to learn.

I once read a chunk of Bond's site after running into that page; after noting its many flaws (including a number of errors of fact, like claiming Bayes tried to prove God using his theorem when IIRC, that was Richard Price and he didn't use a version of Bayes theorem), I was curious what the rest was like.

I have to say, I have never read video game reviews which were quite so... politicized.

Open thread, August 12-18, 2013

by David_Gerard 1 min read12th Aug 2013125 comments

4


If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.