I don't think dismissing something based solely on who funds it is a good choice. Look at the science and the facts. The fact that someone you don't like funds an organization doesn't mean that that organization is spouting lies, and it doesn't mean the science behind the health advice is wrong. There's a pretty simple reasons for why all of those companies would fund a health organization: it's good PR.

I don't think dismissing something based solely on who funds it is a good choice. Look at the science and the facts.

It's quite easy in nutrition to argue for a lot of different positions by cherry picking studies.

It also easy to find them lying in favor of the commercial interest of mosanto:

The FDA uses the Total Diet Study to determine pesticide residues in foods. The study limits pesticide residues to five to ten times lower than is found to be safe. In short, these residues are regulated to levels that are considered safe based on the average da

... (read more)

Open thread, 18-24 August 2014

by David_Gerard 1 min read18th Aug 201481 comments

5


Previous open thread

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.


Notes for future OT posters:

1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.

2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one.

3. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.

4. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.