Grognor | v1.21.0Mar 12th 2012 | (+180/-121) | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.20.0Nov 17th 2009 | (-84) byline removal | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.19.0Oct 31st 2009 | (+355/-89) nope, that lost the reason for the distinction between magic and non-magic | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.18.0Oct 31st 2009 | quote italics | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.17.0Oct 31st 2009 | (+19) | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.16.0Oct 31st 2009 | still needs work, but removing cleanup tag | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.15.0Oct 31st 2009 | fixing quotation display | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.14.0Oct 31st 2009 | (+492/-420) rewrite | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.13.0Oct 30th 2009 | (+18) It needs a rewrite in view of there being the [[Magical categories]] page | ||
PeerInfinity | v1.12.0Sep 28th 2009 |
Traditional depictions of magic would seem to require introducing complex ontologically fundamental entities: some magician or sorceress says the right words and performs some ritual, and some part of the universe obeys their will. But how does it know when to obey someone's will? The stated conditions for the effect are far too complex to be implemented by a simple arrangement of mechanistic laws, the complexity of magic must be at least that of minds. What seems to humans like a simple explanation, sometimes isn't at all.
In our own naturalistic, reductionist universe, it doesn't work this way: minds are made out of simple, mathematically-describable parts.there is always a simpler explanation. Any complicated thing that happens, happens because there is some physical mechanism behind it, even if you don't know the mechanism yourself (which is most of the time). There is no magic.
Traditional depictions of magic would seem to require ontologically fundamental entities: some magician or sorceress says the right words and performs some ritual, and some part of the universe obeys their will. In our own naturalistic, reductionist universe, it doesn't work this way: minds are made out of simple, mathematically-describable parts. Any complicated thing that happens, happens because there is some physical mechanism behind it, even if you don't know the mechanism yourself (which is most of the time). There is no magic.
Expecting magical effects inTraditional depictions of magic would seem to require ontologically fundamental entities: some magician or sorceress says the natural world is much more difficult than it might seem. Magic usually involves effects that require intelligence to carry through,right words and so the complexity of magic must be at least that of minds. A category that can only be recognized by a mindperforms some ritual, and not simpler mechanism is called "magical category". It won't be useful in explanationssome part of the natural mindless processes. One interesting varietyuniverse obeys their will. In our own naturalistic, reductionist universe, it doesn't work this way: minds are made out of simple, mathematically-describable parts. Any complicated thing that happens, happens because there is sympathetic magicsome physical mechanism behind it, even if you don't know the mechanism yourself (which is most of the time).