Perspectives On Intelligence Explosion

Swimmer963 (Miranda Dixon-Luinenburg) (-1) reviewed, copied discussion page
John_Maxwell (+43/-213)
John_Maxwell (+58) /* Criticism */
XiXiDu Changed the link to a category of my homepage to an index of posts from that category.
John_Maxwell (+6/-22) /* Contentious discussion */
John_Maxwell (+318/-252)
John_Maxwell John Maxwell IV moved page [[Criticism of the sequences]] to [[Perspectives on intelligence explosion]]: This page wasn't really about the sequences, just intelligence explosion.
John_Maxwell (+569/-380) More links; created a new contentious discussion section
John_Maxwell (+40)
[anonymous] (-241) It's a wiki.

This page is meant to be inclusive, not exclusive--marginal casesthread has a more up-to-date list of criticism and criticism that doesn't seem well thought out should also be included. Direct responses to criticism should also be included when available.critiques.

This page is to collect links to criticism of what seems to be the ideas inprevailing view on Less Wrong regarding the possibility of sequenceshard takeoff and the importance of FAI. The purpose of doing this is to give readers the opportunity to hear both sides of the debate before making up their mind on controversial topics.

This page is meant to be inclusive, not exclusive--marginal cases of criticism and criticism that doesn't seem well thought out should also be included. If this gets to be too much of a problem, we can split the page into multiple sections. Direct responses to criticism should also be included when available.

LinksCriticism

Contentious discussion

You're strongly encouraged to add additional links and summarize existing ones. (Since the page is meant to be inclusive, it's okay to add links to things you haven't read.) Having these links sorted by persuasiveness could also be valuable.

Load More (10/15)