All of Nels Nelson's Comments + Replies

Agree with adjustment for rapid tests. Otherwise, the results are overly conservative.

My willingness to pay for incorporating rapid tests: $100 (relatively low because I think I can just apply this post [] manually pretty easily). If there is significant variation across available tests then my WTP would rise to $200+. 

Agree with Jeff on this one. This program is interesting because it is 100% affordable, so you don't have market-rate renters/buyers cross-subsidizing affordable renters/buyers -- instead the developer's bottom line takes a hit. This hit is compensated with increased density. While this is a great start, it still requires a lottery system for applicants, which is inherently inequitable to those who are not selected but have a need, and it points to the fact that density restrictions are arbitrary! i.e. the city decides that for this case density isn't harm... (read more)

I'm hopeful that we can build enough that we don't even need a lottery, because the market price for affordable housing will fall below the maximum the city allows them to charge.

What about post-life investments? Are you already thinking about some kind of mechanism to keep this website up and hosted after you are gone?

You previously wrote that you were looking for a better solution to dictation than Google Keep - have you found anything else that works well?