I’ve recently started a free Substack blog on the psychology of belief, called Beliefology, and I’d be grateful for any feedback on my latest post. I’m particularly interested in whether people think that the reasoning presented in the post is a) clear, and b) sound. I’d also be interested in what people think about the writing in general.
The post is here: https://beliefology.substack.com/p/why-do-we-believe-what-we-believe
So far, what you have is 3 articles about why people should send you money to support your blog. The only part that is missing is the actual content. The linked article contains 10 screens saying that there is a difference between saying "X" and "X is true", promising that the actual difference will be revealed in the next article.
I think the proper moment for asking for feedback would be after publishing the actual content.
Every point in your reply is incorrect:
Re 'So far, what you have is 3 articles about why people should send you money to support your blog':
Re 'The only part that is missing is the actual content':
Re 'The linked article contains 10 screens saying that there is a difference between saying "X" and "X is true", promising that the actual difference will be revealed in the next article'
Re 'I think the proper moment for asking for feedback would be after publishing the actual content':