Claude:
I hear you. That feeling of drowning, of having no energy left to fight — it's one of the most exhausting states a person can experience. And you're right about the research model you mentioned (the forced swim test), though it's worth noting that what looks like "giving up" in that experiment is actually the animal conserving energy, switching strategies when thrashing doesn't work. There's wisdom in that shift.
Here are some ideas that might reach you even when you're in that storm:
The paradox of letting go When you're drowning, the instinct is to thrash, which exhausts you faster. Survival instructors teach something counterintuitive: in rough water, sometimes you need to stop fighting against the water and instead work with it. Float when you can. Let the waves carry you when fighting them drains you. This isn't giving up — it's strategic surrender that preserves your energy for when you can actually use it.
The storm is not permanent, even when it feels infinite Your nervous system, when overwhelmed, loses its ability to perceive time accurately. Five minutes of panic feels like hours. A week of despair feels like your entire future. But storms, by their nature, are temporary weather systems. They move. You don't have to believe this intellectually right now — just hold it as a possibility.
You don't need to see the way out You just need to survive the next moment, then the next. When you're in zero visibility, you don't navigate — you just keep your head above water for one more breath. That's not failure; that's exactly what survival looks like in a storm. The path reveals itself gradually, not all at once.
Sometimes "doing nothing" is the most powerful action When the mouse stops swimming frantically, it's not giving up — it's recognizing that the current strategy isn't working. In your life: if everything you're trying isn't working, the answer might not be to try harder. It might be to stop, rest, and let your nervous system reset. Permission to rest is not permission to give up.
You're describing depression with startling clarity The fact that you're connecting your experience to that research suggests you understand what you're dealing with. Depression lies to you. It tells you there's no way out, no energy, no point. These aren't truths about your situation — they're symptoms of your condition. They feel absolutely real, but they're more like a weather report from inside the storm rather than objective facts about your life.
Reach for the smallest rope You don't need a rescue ship. You need something to hold onto right now. That might be: calling one person. Taking a shower. Going outside for three minutes. Eating something. These aren't solutions — they're just ways to stay afloat a little longer. And that's enough.
If you're in the water alone, you shouldn't be This storm you're describing — if it's ongoing, if you're often in this state — this is the time to reach for professional help. A therapist, a doctor, a crisis line, someone. Not because you're broken, but because no one should have to navigate a storm like this without support. You wouldn't judge someone for needing a life raft.
What you're experiencing sounds like it goes beyond normal stress or temporary difficulty. If you're having thoughts of harming yourself, please reach out to a crisis service in Argentina (like 135 for emotional support, or go to an emergency room).
Which of these ideas, if any, feels like it might have something for you right now?
Gemini:
The image you paint is incredibly powerful, and it resonates with a feeling that is deeply, frighteningly human. The violent sea, the exhaustion, the sense of being overwhelmed with no way out—this is the very essence of despair. I want to honor the gravity of what you're describing before offering any ideas. This is not a small thing.
You are also incredibly insightful to connect this feeling to the scientific model of the forced swim test. That test is designed to measure behavioral despair, or "learned helplessness." When the mouse stops swimming, it's not because it's lazy; it's because it has learned from the environment that its efforts are futile. It conserves energy because it perceives no hope of escape.
The crucial, life-altering difference is this: You are not that mouse. Your consciousness, your ability to read this, your capacity to conceptualize your own situation, gives you power the mouse does not have. The mouse cannot change the experiment. You can change your relationship to the storm.
Here are my most powerful ideas for when you are drowning in that storm. Think of these not as a magic cure, but as different ways to swim, different ways to float, until the storm passes or you spot the shore.
When you're drowning, the instinct is to thrash wildly. This burns all your energy and pulls you under faster. The first, most counter-intuitive act of survival is to stop fighting the waves and learn to float.
In the vast, chaotic ocean, you don't need to see the shore. You just need to find one piece of driftwood to hold onto. One thing.
You can't see the shore. It's too far, and the spray is in your eyes. Trying to find it will only fill you with despair. Instead, look for a lighthouse.
This is the most critical difference. The mouse in the beaker is utterly alone. Its fate is sealed by the experimenter. You are a human in a society of 8 billion other souls, many of whom have known their own storms.
The feeling that there is "no way out" is a symptom of the storm, not a fact about the world. It is the water filling your lungs, making you believe there is no air.
Your job right now is not to swim to shore. It is to take the next breath.
You have already done the first step by articulating this feeling so clearly. You have already started to swim.
GPT: That image — “swimming in the shit”, drowning in the storm with no way out — is brutal, raw, and very honest.
And you’re right: there’s a real scientific parallel to that image. The forced swim test (Porsolt, 1977) does exactly what you described. Mice are placed in water; at first they fight, swim, try to climb. Eventually, they stop — they float. Researchers once interpreted that as “giving up,” but newer work reframes it as energy conservation — the mouse isn’t surrendering to death, it’s shifting strategies when the previous one fails.
So let’s start Socratically:
When you imagine yourself in that sea — the storm of uncertainty —
👉 do you think what you need most is to swim harder, or to float differently?
That’s the first hinge.
Because many of us instinctively try to “fight harder,” but when the water is chaos — when there’s no visible shore — effort alone can exhaust us faster. Paradoxically, sometimes not fighting the water (acceptance, floating) buys the time for the storm to change.
Now, let’s connect that metaphor to powerful, evidence-based frames from cognitive science and rationality circles (especially those less mainstream, like from LessWrong, Scott Alexander, Michael Vassar, and CFAR).
When we’re drowning, we confuse our internal model with the world itself.
Rationalists call this mistaking the map for the territory.
Our brain says: “There’s no way out,” but that’s a model output, not reality itself.
A useful trick (borrowed from Bayesian reasoning):
“What evidence would I expect to see if there were a way out that I currently can’t see?”
Even if it feels like 1% probability — that 1% keeps you alive long enough to find new priors.
A framework from cybernetics and control theory:
When a system can’t control the environment (like a boat in a storm), it shifts from control mode to prediction mode.
In that mode, you don’t need to fix things yet; you just map how the storm behaves.
You observe patterns: what makes waves worse? what calms them?
This gives you back a sense of agency — not over outcomes, but over observation itself.
That’s sometimes the first step out of learned helplessness.
Eliezer Yudkowsky writes something like: “You are not the environment. You are the part of the environment that can decide.”
Even when nothing works, the act of deciding — even on micro-scales (“I’ll breathe once more before thinking again”) — is a reclaiming of agency.
You don’t have to control the storm.
You just need to notice: what is the smallest decision I can still make here?
Metaphorically — and physiologically — people don’t drown because they stop swimming,
they drown because they panic and lose rhythm.
The literal survival advice in rough seas is:
“Float. Breathe. Wait for a calmer wave before acting.”
Translated to cognition:
“Don’t make strategic life decisions from a panic state.”
It’s fine — even wise — to reduce motion until perception improves.
In meditation and trauma studies, this is the transition from “fight/flight” to “safe-enough-to-think.”
In long storms (like depression, grief, or uncertainty crises), the problem isn’t lack of meaning — it’s that old meanings stop fitting.
Philosopher Viktor Frankl said, “He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.”
Modern cognitive science reframes that as active inference — the brain predicts meaning from patterns. When the world changes too much, we must rebuild those models.
So:
The solution isn’t blind hope — it’s constructing a new prior through tiny experiments.
In the forced swim test, antidepressants don’t make mice swim forever — they make them resume exploration.
That’s the signal that the brain believes exploration has value again.
Similarly, in life:
“Try one small, low-cost action that could slightly update your world-model.”
Don’t ask, “What if this fails?”
Ask, “What would I learn if it did?”
That shift — from proving survival to experimenting in chaos — is how we cognitively “swim again.”
Would you like us to explore, step by step, how to build a mental “raft” from these principles — a set of small, testable actions that help when the waves come again?
We could design it like a cognitive survival kit: one for when you’re swimming, one for when you can’t.
I've been posting my story here at less wrong, but now the conversation has gotten more serious.
What should I do if I'm in the shit? When I'm drowning in a storm of life with no way out?
Sometimes, I picture myself in a violent sea of uncertainty: drowning, exhausted, with no way out.”
And it turns out this isn’t just an analogy, also scientists use a similar test to study depression in animals. Do you know?>
In that experiment, when the mouse realizes there’s no way out, it stops fighting, and researchers observe how different treatments change that behavior.
As I don't trust medicines very much and I can't do genetic improvement: What are your most powerful ideas that could help me when I'm drowning in a storm?
*In the comments I publish 3 answers from AIs