Repo: https://github.com/DavidUdell/sparse_circuit_discovery

TL;DR: A SPAR project from a while back. A replication of an unsupervised circuit discovery algorithm in GPT-2-small, with a negative result.

Thanks to Justis Mills for draft feedback and to Neuronpedia for interpretability data.

Introduction

I (David) first heard about sparse autoencoders at a Bay Area party. I had been talking about how activation additions give us a map from expressions in natural language over to model activations. I said that what I really wanted, though, was the inverse map: the map going from activation vectors over to their natural language content. And, apparently, here it was: sparse autoencoders!

The field of mechanistic interpretability quickly became confident that sparse autoencoder features were the right ontology for understanding model internals. At the high point of the hype, you may recall, Anthropic declared that interpretability had been reduced to "an engineering problem."

Frustratingly, though, the only naturalistic model behavior that had been concretely explained at that point was indirect object identification, dating from back before the sparse autoencoder revolution! In a world where sparse autoencoders just solved it, I would expect everyone and their dog to be sharing pseudocode fully explaining pieces of LLM behavior. On the sparse autoencoder circuits front, here was a representative proffered explanatory circuit at that time:

I cannot directly interpret this image as pseudocode, is the thing. Note that it's definitely true that the features highlighted here are often quite *relevant* and *suggestive*. But the *edges* between features don't really add to my understanding of what is going on. I get the feeling that the crisp mechanistic understanding is *tantalizingly close* here... but still out of reach.

So it struck me as strange that so much capital was being put into tweaking and refining the sparse autoencoder architecture, and not into leveraging existing autoencoders to explain stuff—I thought the whole point was that we had the right ontology for explanations already in our hands! Maybe not full explanations of every model behavior, but full explanations of some model behaviors nonetheless.

The theory of change that this then prompted for our SPAR project was: show how any naturalistic transformer behavior can be concretely explained with sparse autoencoder c...

LLM Mindreading

LLM Mindreading