LESSWRONGTags
LW

Emulation Argument For Human-Level AI

•
Created by joaolkf at 3y

An emulated-brain populated world could hold severe negative consequences, such as:

  • Inherent inability to have consciousness, if some philosophers are right 3456.
  • Elimination of culture in general, due to an extremely increasing penalty for inefficiency in the form of flamboyant displays 7
  • Near zero costs for reproduction, pushing most of emulations to live in a subsistence state. 8
  1. CHALMERS, David. (2010) "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis, Journal of Consciousness Studies", 17 (9-10), pp. 7-65.↩
  3. LUCAS, John. (1961) Minds, machines, and Gödel, Philosophy, 36, pp. 112–127↩
  4. DREYFUS, H. (1972) What Computers Can’t Do, New York: Harper & Row.↩
  5. PENROSE, Roger (1994) Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.↩
  6. BLOCK, Ned (1981) Psychologism and behaviorism, Philosophical Review, 90, pp. 5–43.↩
  7. BOSTROM, Nick.(2004) "The future of human evolution". Death and Anti‐Death: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing, ed. Charles Tandy (Ria University Press: Palo Alto, California, 2004): pp. 339‐371. Available at: http://www.nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution.pdf↩
  8. HANSON, Robin. (1994) "If uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn" Extropy, 6(2). Available at: http://hanson.gmu.edu/uploads.html↩

——————

  1. CHALMERS, David. (2010) "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis, Journal of Consciousness Studies", 17 (9-10), pp. 7-65.↩
  3. LUCAS, John. (1961) Minds, machines, and Gödel, Philosophy, 36, pp. 112–127↩
  4. DREYFUS, H. (1972) What Computers Can’t Do, New York: Harper & Row.↩
  5. PENROSE, Roger (1994) Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.↩
  6. BLOCK, Ned (1981) Psychologism and behaviorism, Philosophical Review, 90, pp. 5–43.↩
  7. BOSTROM, Nick.(2004) "The future of human evolution". Death and Anti‐Death: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing, ed. Charles Tandy (Ria University Press: Palo Alto, California, 2004): pp. 339‐371. Available at: http://www.nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution.pdf↩
  8. Hanson, R.HANSON, Robin. (1994) If"If uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn,dawn" Extropy, 6(2). Available at: http://hanson.gmu.edu/uploads.html↩

The Emulation argument for human-level AI argues that since whole brain emulation seems feasible then human-level AI must also be feasible. There are many underlying assumptions in the argument, most of them are explored by Chalmers (2010)1. Perhaps the most debated premise is holding that a brain emulation could have a consciousness mind or that consciousness isn’t fundamental to human intelligence. Chalmers 2 formalized the argument as follows:”

  • (i) The human brain is a machine.
  • (ii) We will have the capacity to emulate this machine (before long).
  • (iii) If we emulate this machine, there will be AI.

——————

  • (iv) Absent defeaters, there will be AI (before long)”

An emulated-brain populated world could hold severe negative consequences, such as:

  • Inherent inability to have consciousness, if some philosophers are right 3456.
  • Elimination of culture in general, due to an extremely increasing penalty for inefficiency in the form of flamboyant displays 7
  • Near zero costs for reproduction, pushing most of emulations to live in a subsistence state. 8

References

  1. CHALMERS, David. (2010) "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis, Journal of Consciousness Studies", 17 (9-10), pp. 7-65.↩
  3. LUCAS, John. (1961) Minds, machines, and Gödel, Philosophy, 36, pp. 112–127↩
  4. DREYFUS, H. (1972) What Computers Can’t Do, New York: Harper & Row.↩
  5. PENROSE, Roger (1994) Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.↩
  6. BLOCK, Ned (1981) Psychologism and behaviorism, Philosophical Review, 90, pp. 5–43.↩
  7. BOSTROM, Nick.(2004) "The future of human evolution". Death and Anti‐Death: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing, ed. Charles Tandy (Ria University Press: Palo Alto, California, 2004): pp. 339‐371. Available at: http://www.nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution.pdf↩
  8. Hanson, R. (1994) If uploads come first: The crack of a future dawn, Extropy, 6(2). Available at: http://hanson.gmu.edu/uploads.html↩