We often assume that if every individual part of a system is defensible, the system as a whole must be sound. This logic fails spectacularly when confronted with emergence, where complex interactions create outcomes far removed from the intent of any single part. We don't realize the danger until it's already here.

While the mechanism isn't a simple linear 'slippery slope,' the dynamic is just as treacherous. It’s a tyranny of small decisions: each interaction seems locally rational and harmless, yet the cumulative result is catastrophic. We discount the accumulating risk. At what point does the accumulation of "okay" inputs generate a "screwed up" reality? How do we evaluate where to place a Schelling Fence—a bright line we agree not to cross—when the landscape itself is shifting? This brings us to a modern, widespread example of this trap: the emergent effects of social media algorithms on our perception of reality.

The difficulty in answering this lies in the fact that many of the most influential forces today are not centralized manipulators, but non-malevolent emergent systems. My canonical example is Instagram (specifically, the Reels/short-form video format).

This is NOT a social media hate post, but rather an attempt to understand the negative emergent characteristics better and spark discussions regarding its solutions.

Let's break down the mechanism.

PS1: This analysis presumes good faith from all actors to demonstrate that the issue persists even without malicious intent. The introduction of malevolent actors would only exacerbate the situation.

PS2: This analysis is true not only for short form content, but rather most social media, however short form content simply makes the issue much worse.

Part 1: The Fuel (Shock, Assertion, and Selection Bias)

At its core, Instagram is a platform for free expression. It allows millions of creators to share their work, opinions, and daily lives. This is, for the most part, a net positive. It enables connection, creativity, and the free exchange of ideas. Within this framework, even a "hot take" on a political figure or an uneducated opinion is just a form of speech. The platform itself doesn't judge the content; it merely provides the stage.

In an attention economy, the most shocking, emotionally resonant, and polarizing content wins.

Nuance takes time to explain; shock is instantaneous. The algorithm, blind to the tru...

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments