Thanks for your feedback. I just want to go over some of your points:

Motivated reasoning plays into most high stakes decisions in big organisations as the decisions matter.

I came up with my proposal as a possible solution to the problem mentioned in the following article: (https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/improving-institutional-decision-making/). I guess I should have mentioned this article in my proposal.

when you give a lot of political power to your "checks and balance"-committee that's going to act politically as well and won't just follow norms of abstract reasoning.

I mentioned in my proposal that the members of the committee are supposed to be non-partisan, so the members of the committee are not politically motivated. I didn't mention anything in my proposal about the checks and balances committee being regulated, and that is a modification that I should make.

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments