LESSWRONG
LW

2467
Bryan Frances
-40340
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

I’m a former professor of philosophy & logic, with an education in theoretical physics. I published books with Oxford, Cambridge, and other international presses, and had research professorships in the US, UK, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Now I coach people to become the wisest thinker in the room, almost regardless of the room. Not the person with the highest IQ, most knowledge, most serenity, or best moral behavior. I can’t get you those. But I can make you a wildly more wise thinker, in both your professional and personal lives. See here: http://bryanfrances.weebly.com/

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
-12Why There Is No Answer to Your Philosophical Question
3y
10
-14Jordan Peterson: Guru/Villain
3y
6
-12The Knockdown Argument Paradox
3y
6
The Knockdown Argument Paradox
Bryan Frances3y10

I have taught logic classes at several universities. I am assuming that as I am using it in the post, "TS either is or is not human" is logically true. It doesn't matter if there are viable interpretations of it that aren't logically true. I thought it was clear that I was using the sentence to express a logical truth. All I need in the argument is the premise that it can express a logical truth. Almost everyone agrees with that premise, especially since "Taylor Swift" has a referent.

Reply
Jordan Peterson: Guru/Villain
Bryan Frances3y2-2

Thanks for your reply. I agree that we should avoid political topics here. That's why I didn't discuss any of his political, moral, or religious views. It was all about how we treat expertise, as you mentioned.

Reply
The Knockdown Argument Paradox
Bryan Frances3y10

Thanks for the comment. I don't think there is any mistake in basic logic. I could formalize all of it in elementary symbolic logic. It would be first-order predicate logic, but still pretty basic.

Reply
The Knockdown Argument Paradox
Bryan Frances3y10

Thank you for your comment. 

I'm not sure that in order for an argument to be knockdown, there has to be a contrary belief. I might give a new, conclusive argument for a conclusion C that is so new that no one has ever disbelieved it (e.g., perhaps some claim about dark energy, a couple decades ago).

But in any case, if you were right, then the TS arguments wouldn't be knockdown, which is response 2 to the paradox.

'Taylor Swift is or is not human' is short for 'Either Taylor Swift is human or it's not the case that Taylor Swift is human', which is a logical truth on anyone's conception of logic.

Reply