Towards Developmental Interpretability
Developmental interpretability is a research agenda that has grown out of a meeting of the Singular Learning Theory (SLT) and AI alignment communities. To mark the completion of the first SLT & AI alignment summit we have prepared this document as an outline of the key ideas. As the name suggests, developmental interpretability (or "devinterp") is inspired by recent progress in the field of mechanistic interpretability, specifically work on phase transitions in neural networks and their relation to internal structure. Our two main motivating examples are the work by Olsson et al. on In-context Learning and Induction Heads and the work by Elhage et al. on Toy Models of Superposition. Developmental interpretability studies how structure incrementally emerges through phase transitions during training. Mechanistic interpretability emphasizes features and circuits as the fundamental units of analysis and usually aims at understanding a fully trained neural network. In contrast, developmental interpretability: * is organized around phases and phase transitions as defined mathematically in SLT, and * aims at an incremental understanding of the development of internal structure in neural networks, one phase transition at a time. The hope is that an understanding of phase transitions, integrated over the course of training, will provide a new way of looking at the computational and logical structure of the final trained network. We term this developmental interpretability because of the parallel with developmental biology, which aims to understand the final state of a different class of complex self-assembling systems (living organisms) by analyzing the key steps in development from an embryonic state.[1] In the rest of this post, we explain why we focus on phase transitions, the relevance of SLT, and how we see developmental interpretability contributing to AI alignment. > Thank you to @DanielFilan, @bilalchughtai, @Liam Carroll for reviewing early drafts of this
