Fernand0

Consider the following argument about Agent Foundations: > Premise 1: There's a lot of bunk in AF > Premise 2: Some of the bunk in AF would become more valuable by having more empirical grounding > Conclusion: AF needs more empirical grounding. I've argued that the conclusion of this argument...

Agent Foundations is the attempt to conceptually understand agency[1]. Some sensible attitudes towards this attempt are: a) AF is a well-defined task like "solving computability" which, if ever successfully solved[2], ends up as a self-contained network of concepts and proofs. b) AF is ill-defined: b1) Because it is a meaningless...