Decision-makers and populists on the topic of education are focused on the oppression axis, and support of "disadvantaged" groups and individuals, and do not want to accept the model that some kids are inherently variant in ways that can't be applied to all/most.
True, but I think a lot of them also at least theoretically subscribe to the idea that there are "multiple intelligences", and are willing to believe that some kids are really good at subject A as long as they're also deficient at subject B. Therefore, I don't think they should be able to muster nearly as severe opposition to the proposal of letting kids move up and down in individual... (read 2832 more words →)
I gave a talk on exceptionally gifted children at the Reproductive Frontiers Summit at Lighthaven this June. I believe the subject matter is highly relevant to the experience of many rationalists (e.g. one of Scott's surveys has put the average IQ of his readers at 137, and although that's not as extreme as 160+, I think many of the observations generalize to the merely highly gifted). The talk is on YouTube:
True, but I think a lot of them also at least theoretically subscribe to the idea that there are "multiple intelligences", and are willing to believe that some kids are really good at subject A as long as they're also deficient at subject B. Therefore, I don't think they should be able to muster nearly as severe opposition to the proposal of letting kids move up and down in individual... (read 2832 more words →)