4/4 I need to alpha-test this right now.

3/4 I want this, please release it!

2/4 Maybe I'll have a look if/when it's ready

1/4 Not for me.

Poll (vote with a 👍)

Reading this gave me an uncomfortable moment considering my feelings for all the people who expect things of me or of whom I expect things, outside the specific context of debt.

It makes me think of the very common case in society of someone taking care of an elderly or otherwise care-needing relative.

But like @Dagon says, this is only one aspect of such interpersonal relationships, out of many. In particular, taking this "as reason to avoid debt in all its forms more" sounds to me like hoping never to get in a situation which in fact happens all the time. It would be throwing a lot of human interactions out with the bathwater.

I think one could consider it a part of mental health to be able to make commitments without resenting it, and to manage situations in which such resentment arises.

Added

Thanks, I have applied most suggestions.

Indeed I didn't choose the formulas myself but just told GPT to produce some, and then removed a few that seemed dubious or irrelevant.

Thank you.

Right. So, considering that the most advanced AIs of a leading AI company such as OpenAI are not agents, what do you think of the following plan to solve or help solve AI risk: keep making more and more powerful Q&A AIs that are not agents until we have ones that are smarter than us, then ask them how to solve the problem. Do you think this is a safe and reasonable pursuit? Or do you think we just won't get to superhuman intelligence that way?