Top postsTop post
Recently, Eliezer Yudkowsky participated in a very flawed podcast of Doom Debates that reflected poorly on him, and, likely in the eyes of many, the entire AI safety movement. The premise of the debate was that Eliezer Yudkowsky was offered 10,000$ to debate an anonymous "AI lab director", and this...
In Only Law Can Prevent Extinction, Eliezer Yudkowsky argues that creating a strict, globally-enforced regulatory framework for artificial intelligence development is the best, and perhaps only, chance for humanity to prevent extinction from misaligned AI. This post is one of the most upvoted posts on Less Wrong in the past...
The United States government is not on track to implement significant AI safety policies before the development of AGI.[1] Several expert forecasts and prediction platforms suggest that AGI is 50% likely to be developed by the early to mid-2030s, which means its not unlikely that we only have 1-2 more...
Recently, the moderators of LessWrong have decided to change the site's policies on LLM usage. The essence of the policy can be summarized by the following excerpt: > With all that in mind, our new policy is this: > > * "LLM output" includes all of: > * * text...
Introduction: The next presidential election represents a significant opportunity for advocates of AI safety to influence government policy. Depending on the timeline for the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI), it may also be one of the last U.S. elections capable of meaningfully shaping the long-term trajectory of AI governance....
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence is advancing rapidly, raising significant concerns about its safe development and deployment. Despite widespread public concern about AI, there is a notable absence of a sustained political movement dedicated to addressing these issues. While certain organizations and individuals are engaged in shaping AI policy, these efforts have...