When you finally understand something, it just clicks. It fits. You can re-derive it, explain it, use it.

That moment captures the hallmark of what I call common-sense learning: an understanding that fuses new ideas into your existing model of the world until they feel self-evident.

At its core, learning means modifying your mental model of reality, the web of ideas that forms your internal common sense. There are two ways to do this:

Integrate new information into what you already know.
Expand your model to include something genuinely new.

The first path is easier and more stable. When you learn, your first move should be to see how the new idea fits. Fitting it is an art: reframe the problem, look at it from different angles until you find a perspective that feels intuitive to you. Once it fits, it stabilizes. Your brain no longer treats it as foreign information but as structure within your existing model.

Example: summing numbers

Take something simple:

$1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n$

Here is the usual derivation:

$S = 1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n$ $S = n + (n - 1) + (n - 2) + \dots + 1$ $2 S = n (n + 1) \Rightarrow S = \frac{n (n + 1)}{2}$

But are you able to recall at a glance if it is $n (n + 1)$ or $n (n - 1)$ ?

The formula is a result stored in memory. To get to it, you replay a series of symbolic manipulations. It works, but it does not fuse with your intuition. It is not common-sense integrated. It is a memorized procedure that is easy to forget and hard to extend.

If I asked you to sum the series $11 + 15 + 19 + \dots + 207$ , would you instantly know what to do? You'd probably reconstruct the pattern symbolically again. It never became part of your model of how numbers behave.

Many of us remember a mnemonic for arithmetic progressions: first plus last, times how many, divided by two. You might recall it instantly and use it flawlessly, but that still isn't common-sense learning. You can't re-derive it on sight, nor see the boundaries of where it holds, unless you also mechanically recall that it reliably works for arithmetic progressions... but why does it?

How to find a common-sense perspective

Start watching your own reasoning unfold:

"Hm. There's $n$ , $n + 1$ , and a divide by 2... but why those?"

"Multiplying by the last term is not fundamental. In the formula, $n$ seems to actually encode how many elements there are."

"Wait a minute... the first term plus the last, divided by two. That's simply the average of the series!"

"I'll be damned! The sum of a list of elements is simply the...

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments