Zvi said:

Unconditional Grants to Worthy Individuals Are Great
The process of applying for grants, raising money, and justifying your existence sucks.
A lot.
It especially sucks for many of the creatives and nerds that do a lot of the best work.
If you have to periodically go through this process, and are forced to continuously worry about making your work legible and how others will judge it, that will substantially hurt your true productivity. At best it is a constant distraction. By default, it is a severe warping effect. A version of this phenomenon is doing huge damage to academic science.

Compelled by this, I'm considering funding ~three people for two years each to work on whatever they see fit, much like the the Thiel Fellowship, but with an AI Alignment angle.

I want to find people who are excited to work on existential risk, but are currently spending much of their time working on something else due to financial reasons.

Instead of delegating the choice to some set of grant makers, I think that aggregating the opinion of the crowd could work better (at least as good at finding talent, but with less overall time spent)

The best system I can think of at the moment would be to give every member of the alignment forum one vote with the ability to delegate it. Let everybody nominate any person in the world, including themselves, and award grants to the top 3.

I'm asking for feedback and advice:

Is this a good idea in general, or maybe it's obviously an order of magnitude worse than existing opportunities?
Maybe the list of perfect candidates already exists, waiting to get funded?
What should be the amount? Thiel gave 200k. Is it too much for 2 years? Too little?
How could a nomination and voting system be improved? And especially, who should get a vote? Should it be Alignment Forum members, or users registered before a certain date, or Lesswrong users?
Could there be an entirely different approach to finding fellows? How would you do it?

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments