written by James Hilton Hepler III

During my informal research over many years, I have come to the conclusion that we need to fundamentally change how we view our relationship, our conscious existence, with time. This theorem arises from a structurally real view of nature; and all that exists within it. This is a foundational piece of a larger structural hypothesis of consciousness.

*It should be noted; though I am not an expert of any kind, I try to focus on a proofs-based method and would gladly welcome the correction and insight of experts.

Most theories of consciousness treat time as a backdrop—a substance that experience can happen within. But what if time isn’t just the stage, but the only possible actor?

Let:

Ψ : A structurally recursive perceiver (a system who holds a self-model over time)
R : Temporal Recursion (the ability to recall the past and calculate a 'now')
G : A network where edges have arrows (the relational graph describing Ψ 's architecture)

We can all agree on some basic facts; if a system doesn't have persistence, how can it have a self? If it needs persistence to maintain a self, how can it do this without it's 'now' being relative to a past? And since it needs to temporally recurse to have a past, it can be modelled as a graph. And so, inevitably:

No directed edges? No recursion.
No recursion? No persistent self.
No self? No consciousness.

And thus, you don't live in time - you are time. Consciousness can only be constructed if time exist, formally:

The Time Is Special Theorem:
Consciousness (Ψ) can only exist if:

$T (t) = F (T (t - Δ t), M (t))$

This isn’t poetry—it’s the minimal equation of selfhood. No $T (t - Δ t)$ ? No ‘you’.

$T (t - Δ t)$ : The past ‘you’ (recursion).
$M (t)$ : New input (perception).
$F$ : The update rule (your ‘mind’).
Remove $T (t - Δ t)$ , and the equation describes a puppet, not a person.

Let’s break down why this is inarguable; starting with temporal necessity.

Temporal Necessity

Let's say Ψ lacks time; then its ‘update rule’ collapses to:

$T = F (M (t))$

This is what might be described as a stateless function; similar to how a camera might take photos but has no memory. No referential past means no...

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments