Yea, it'd be a bonus to convince/inform folks that, if this works out, other people won't be evil,
& if we don't do that then some folks still might do bad things bc they think other folks are bad,

But as long as one doesn't see a way this idea makes things actively worse, It's still a good idea!

Thanks for pointing that out tho. Will add that ("that" being "Making sure folks understand that, if this idea is implemented, other folks won't be as evil, and you can stop being as bad to them") to the idea.

Thanks!

f it starts feeling too easy you might have messed up.

... it immediately felt too hard. :')
Also, since I don't have a good measure on what's organized & what's not, I genuinely think ME doing this would result in an even messier article with a ton of random edits scattered around that I think looks cleaner. 
I just simply can't measure for something better than this current version, & thus if I tried to make a better version, I fundamentally couldn't tell if I made a better version or a worse version.

I guess what I'm trying to say is I'd super appreciate if you tried to iteratively edit it a bit to help this idea which is worth doing reach it's full potential & not just be a messy article hinting at a good idea but everyone who reads it gets stuck up on the messiness part.

Thanks, super appreciate the help! :DD

Oh thanks! I actually really appreciate it! This seems super useful!

Thanks for the feedback!

To me this looks organized...

...which means I can't tell if something looks organized or not.

Which means if I were to write it again & thought the new version was "organized", it still wouldn't be organized.

If you're so sure my writing was bad, then you'd do a much better job writing it.

So if you don't mind, I'd love for you to write a more organized one. (Like genuinely I'd super appreciate it if you rewrote this better than my sloppy job, please do that)

Otherwise it'll stay super disorganized.

(Also just FYI, that was genuinely rude)

Yep!

It's just that "Making Russia bigger, stronger and more respected" is what counts as "his 'moral' goals". It's his morals/goals/values. I'm using them as synonyms.

That part's really just a tiny word-choice thing, and I appreciate that you have enough attention to detail to call me out for using the slightly wrong word there. Definitely a good thing that you pointed that out.

I was gonna reply to this with some beautiful message on how we, as beings that exist, care about eachother regardless of what kind of being we are, and that you don't need to be a cat to care about cats, but then I forgot :P

I also would've included the point "Just replace every word 'cat' here with the word 'conscious being', and hopefully you'll end up with an aligned AGI!"

I also would've included the question, "How do we make it so the mysterious force of evolution also works to make all other animals happy? (This question goes both for nature and for factory farms!)

- for factory-farmed chickens though, you could maybe use govt. mandated-on-chicken-farms-above-100,000-chickens gene drive to manipulate the chickens into not feeling pain?

That does still sound cruel though...

Was this written by a cat?

Yeah, agreed, but either way, it's a motivating sentence, so I reckon it's good to pretend its true

(except for when doing so would lead you to make a misinformed, worse decision. Then, know that it's only maybe true if we try hard/smart enough)

good point, I changed it!