I think I might have a promising and better intervention for preventing individuals EAs and Rationalists from “turning crazy”. What would you want to do with it?

Update: I resolved maybe all of my neck tension and vagus nerve tension. I don't know how to tell whether this increased by intelligence though. It's also not like I had headaches or anything obvious like that before

this post seems like a win for PIBBSS gee

I like how detailed this post is

Any updates?

How much higher was the scoring on neuroticism than the general population?

How many alignment researchers do you think there are total? What % do you think this survey hit that you wanted it to hit?

I'll be there! Talk to me about boundaries and coordination/Goodness

Andy Matuschak @andymatuschak:

Finally found a single actual screenshot of the DARPA Digital Tutor (sort of—a later commercial adaptation). Crazy-making that there were zero figures in any of the papers about its design, and not enough details to imagine one.

Some observations:
* An instructional interface is presented alongside a live machine.
* Student presented with a concrete task to achieve in the live system.
* The training system begins by “discussing the situation”, probing the student’s understanding with q's, and responding with appropriate feedback and follow-up tasks.
* It can observe the student’s actions in the live system and respond appropriately.
* The instructional interface uses a text-conversational modality.
* I see strong influence from Graesser's AutoTutor, and some from Anderson's Cognitive Tutors.

(from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-06-09-how-learning-engineering-hopes-to-speed-up-education )

https://twitter.com/andy_matuschak/status/1782095737096167917 

This all seems very teleological. Do you have thoughts on what the teleology of the universe could be under this model?