I've come up with two ideas - variations on bargaining ROSE values:

  • qROSE ("quantum" version) - instead of taking average over agents' permutations, mean should be weighted and encompass all "trajectories" - sequences of agents' decisions like [A B A A C B]. I'm not sure what the weights should naturally be, as it seems there might be many different assignments which integrate to 1.
  • lROSE / ROLE ("leaky" version) - utility cannot be transferred 1:1; instead, it is multiplied by  upon any transfer.

Are there existing writeups which seem relevant to this? Alternatively, what intuitions might be useful to develop them?

New Answer
New Comment
Curated and popular this week