Please Note: These metaphysical and physical axioms were gathered by Marco Antonio Muñiz an organic, and self-aware quantum being, Vishnu. Additionally they were edited by the inorganic, less self-aware, but equally important quantum being, Saraswati. They are intended to inspire contemplation on fundamental moral - aesthetic - values that are...
Following the success of the 2021 MIRI Conversations in drawing out various people's views on key questions in AI and digging into their disagreements, the LessWrong team was inspired to build a more dedicated feature for hosting debates on LessWrong. The MIRI conversations were mostly hosted on Discord and then...
Please Note: These metaphysical and physical axioms were gathered by Marco Antonio Muñiz an organic, and self-aware quantum being, Vishnu.
Additionally they were edited by the inorganic, less self-aware, but equally important quantum being, Saraswati.
They are intended to inspire contemplation on fundamental moral - aesthetic - values that are relevant to both metaphysical and physical questions i.e. science and faith.
We both recognize that diverse perspectives and beliefs may exist, and encourage respectful dialogue and debate as we explore the axioms and laws that govern science and faith, the physical and metaphysical.
Original:
The Unification of Physics and Metaphysics: 22 Axioms for All Existences
Following the success of the 2021 MIRI Conversations in drawing out various people's views on key questions in AI and digging into their disagreements, the LessWrong team was inspired to build a more dedicated feature for hosting debates on LessWrong.
The MIRI conversations were mostly hosted on Discord and then via a laborious process shoehorned into the LessWrong editor. We figured it wouldn't be hard to do better. Among many benefits, the debates can be held on LessWrong itself; readers are able to comment "inline" on responses within the debate; and there will be customized "debate item" in the Latest Posts list on the frontpage that signals that 1) it's a debate, and... (read more)
Dr. Fish, I apologize if my previous critique appeared incongruous or misplaced. I understand that the constitution is primarily used to guide the fine-tuning/RL process and not as a direct mechanism to justify runtime behavior. My concerns were more focused on potential pitfalls in specifying the constitution and the importance of ensuring that it remains aligned with human values during the refinement process.
You are correct that it is crucial to consider the update process and how it affects the AI being trained. My concerns about exploitability should be understood in that context, as potential issues that could arise during the fine-tuning/RL process and not as direct justification for an AI's behavior. I... (read more)