The main issue is, theories about how to run job interviews are developed in collaboration between businesses who need to hire people, theories on how to respond to court questions are developed in collaboration between gang members, etc.. While a business might not be disincentized from letting the non-hired employees better at negotiating, it is incentivized to teach other businesses ways of making their non-hired employees worse at negotiating.
Are you really gone claim that this is not a good post:
Thesis: Intellectuals are naturally attracted to poop because it is causally downstream of everything and so ends up having unusually high mutual information with everything, despite not causally influencing much (compared to e.g. food).
?
1Trying to obtain worst-case regret bounds.
Users of LessWrong, then
I did well by taking care of myself and trying to help things progress.
Issue with judging the practitioners is that practicing it may be correlated with other things that are much more harmful. Like all the talk about how single parenthood is supposedly bad for you, but then it doesn't hold up to more careful scrutiny afaik.
Autism is caused by not having access to those markets.
This makes emotions subservient to rationality, but I think a lot of the people who complain about the rationalist approach to emotions instead see rationality as a system to generate compromises between emotions. From the latter perspective, the rationalist approach only really works with infinitesimal emotions.