Make a point of not engaging in the standard academic research performances, and figure out how to cure cancer anyway.
I hear this a lot, but it doesn't seem to be very effective for people who do genuinely want to improve the world in tangible ways through academic research. The direction in fields like math and physics seems to be overwhelmingly in the direction of massive collaboration, and Symbols can be effective ways of organizing collective action on a hard problem. People joke about spending hundreds of dollars going to conferences just to spend the whole time falling asleep at talks and having coffee with strangers -- but everyone also has a story about the great collaboration that came out of a random hallway conversation at a conference.
That being said, there are some high-profile researchers who choose to communicate outside of papers and conferences. Chris Olah's blog and Grant Sanderson's YouTube channel come to mind. However, these all seem to be people for whom changing the way academics communicate is part of their core mission. For someone who just wants to do genuinely impactful research, I don't know if I can recommend "Fuck The Symbols."
The direction in fields like math and physics seems to be overwhelmingly in the direction of massive collaboration, and Symbols can be effective ways of organizing collective action on a hard problem.
Counterargument: both of these fields seem to have started producing actually-useful things at a much slower rate around the same time the shift toward large collaborations happened. Some people claim that the problems became harder in a way which required more people, but this does not seem more likely than theories in which the causal arrow goes the other wa... (read more)
What does it mean to “stay grounded”? Why does it matter? How does one stay grounded?
Examples
Let’s start with a bunch of examples of grounding failures - i.e. people failing to stay grounded.
Note that these “failures” are not necessarily unintended/unwanted. Lots of hedge funds stay afloat mainly by bringing in investors, despite never beating the market. And hiring Brilliant People is a great way to look good to investors, regardless of whether they manage to beat the market.
In particular, many of the examples involve strategies which are good for winning social status, just not for whatever they’re nominally about. Graduates From The Best Schools or Volunteering to End Hunger or Publishing Papers or eating Good Food or Raising Awareness are all good ways to win social status, even in cases where they don’t actually help much with their nominal purpose. Humans often act as though social status is their “real” subconscious motivator, but they self-deceive about it.
The Unifying Idea
In each of the examples above, some Symbols (capitalized in each example) have decoupled from what they represent. The Symbols are “ungrounded”, in the sense of the symbol-grounding problem.
There’s some socially-recognized Symbol of the thing - sometimes something which actually does help with the thing, sometimes a generic status symbol, but always something which people associate with the thing. Publishing Papers is a symbol of scientific progress, Good Grades are a symbol of a successful life in the making, Nice Clothes are a symbol of generic high status. People spend time and effort and resources on the Symbol, but obtaining the Symbol isn’t always sufficient to get them the thing. Publishing Papers isn’t enough to cure cancer, getting Good Grades isn’t enough to lead to a satisfying life, buying Nice Clothes isn’t enough to make one look good or feel comfortable, etc. Even if the Symbol can help somewhat, people often continue to pour resources into the Symbol long after it has ceased to be a bottleneck to obtaining the thing.
Another way to put it: grounding failure means Goodharting on the Symbol, and failing to actually get the thing as a result.
If your main goal is in fact to accumulate social status (regardless of whether you explicitly acknowledge this fact), then the situation is a bit different. The Symbols are far more important to your objective than the things they nominally represent; welcome to Simulacrum 3. So focusing on the Symbol over the thing is not a failure at all; the Symbol is what you actually want, on some level. If the suggestions in the next section about how to stay grounded sound aversive, unpleasant, or like they’re not really what you want, then consider that you may actually subconsciously want the social status more than the thing. If that’s you, then don’t worry about staying grounded - that’s not the game you’re playing.
But for those of us who are more interested in the thing than the Symbol, how can we stay grounded?
Fuck The Symbols
The most reliable way I know to avoid grounding failures is to say “Fuck The Symbols”. Make a point of not pursuing the Symbols, and try to obtain the thing anyway.
Make a point of not engaging in the standard academic research performances, and figure out how to cure cancer anyway.
Make a point of finding ways to be happy without doing the things which happy people do in commercials.
Make a point of not going out of your way to get good grades, and find a profitable/rewarding career path anyway.
Find ways to build a profitable business without Ivy League MBAs.
This isn’t always the best choice, but it’s usually worth at least thinking about how to do it - because the process of thinking about it forces you to recognize that the Symbol does not necessarily give the thing, and consider what’s actually needed.