Actually not even him, but he was usually extremely rational and rigorous in his approach - more than any other economist I know of - albeit often poorly communicated.
Interestingly, this is pretty much what I used to say about Marx when I was a Marxist.
My point was to indicate that not all people who put stock in the "Austrian school" accept post-Misesians as competent intepreters. I meant, essentially: Mises had it right, but read his original work (not later Austrians) and you'll be able to tell whether I'm right.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.