LESSWRONG
LW

56
Abe
65050
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
Tax Price Gouging?
Abe8mo133

If items are only available at "gouged" rates, then this will make them more expensive. That is, this tax will fall only on people in the emergency zone, and specifically those who are desperate enough to buy goods at these elevated costs. Since demand is very inelastic under these circumstances, the tax burden will fall almost entirely on the consumer.

Another approach might be to temporarily raise taxes everywhere except the emergency zone on these goods. For example, if bottled water falls under a temporary excise tax during a hurricane everywhere except the hurricane zone, that incentivizes sellers to bring bottled water to the hurricane victims.

Reply
China Hawks are Manufacturing an AI Arms Race
Abe9mo10

I listen to his podcast semi-regularly, and this just seems like a pretty slippery description of his views. It's pretty obvious that he favors the United States taking a less aggressive stance toward China, for example in his views on the various protectionist measures that the United States has taken in the last ten years. He also seems to see more room for cooperation than anyone I would describe as a China hawk, and in this podcast he suggests that China could likely liberalize after Xi:

https://www.manifold1.com/episodes/molson-hart-china-and-amazon-up-close-60/transcript

I don't think it's an unreasonable take, but it's not one that I would describe as "hawkish".

Reply
Big tech transitions are slow (with implications for AI)
Abe11mo10

This argument seems to be a one by analogy. steam engine:industrial revolution::???:machine learning. But as you can see there's a term in the analogy I don't understand. Is ??? chatgpt? LLMs? Transformers? AlexNet? The internet? Digital computers? Something that hasn't yet been invented?

Reply
BIG-Bench Canary Contamination in GPT-4
Abe11mo531

It should be pointed out that the original paper/press release describing GPT-4 explicitly says that they found that BIG-bench had contaminated their training data, and therefore excluded it as an evaluation. As far as I know there was no similar disclosure for claude or other models. See footnote 5 here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774v1

Reply63
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 | Microsoft Research
Abe2y21

Leetcode questions are not selected for novelty. In fact, the best way to get a problem turned into a Leetcode question is to post it to Leetcode's discussion board and say someone asked you it in an interview at a big tech company. So it's still possible that some or even many these questions appear nearly verbatim in the training data.

Reply
No posts to display.