This is an argument with some merit presented in a slightly antagonistic way. Some specific thoughts.
First, the case for competence. This post argues that they are not competent on the grounds that:
They should be able to reliably diagnose diseases they are trained to diagnose and should be knowledgeable at the standard to qualify as a doctor. If evidence against this were presented here it would be a concern, however the evidence presented mainly demonstrates that:
they are not good at diagnosing rare diseases (this is not a typical use case for primary ca
This is an argument with some merit presented in a slightly antagonistic way. Some specific thoughts.
First, the case for competence. This post argues that they are not competent on the grounds that:
- They should be able to reliably diagnose diseases they are trained to diagnose and should be knowledgeable at the standard to qualify as a doctor. If evidence against this were presented here it would be a concern, however the evidence presented mainly demonstrates that:
- they are not good at diagnosing rare diseases (this is not a typical use case for primary ca
... (read more)