ahel

I'd change the Talker to be "the post-hoc Commentator".

Its comments about the self are actually post-hoc comments: they have no "privileged access" to the self-doer which is just a forward pass on already "landed" (and therefore fixed) tokens.

Same way why we have so many "I'm sorry, I did it again" and "you keep on doing X, please stop" doesn't work.

The post-hoc explanations are even worse when sub-agents are involved, for the same reason.

I tot agree that it cannot be argued as "just a tic".

I'm aware that it's important but I consistently fail to do implement as habit. I tried different approaches (notebook, journal on computer, one of those thousands of productivity apps on phone/tablet/watch etc) but nothing sticks.

What frame of mind do you use to remind yourself that is worth it every morning?

(Also I'm very drowsy in the early phases of my mornings)

Thanks for your work.

I don't know where or how to put it properly -sorry- so I'll throw it here:

You'll probably already know Hypothes.is which is a way to annotate the web.

What are your thoughts about it? I was starting re-reading the Sequences here, but as soon as I started highlighting on my new device, I realized that I already had highlighted sentences or major points.

I went back to find that "annotate all the web" I remebered reading some years ago.

I think I'll personally give it a try. I'm in no way related to the... (read more)

Thanks, when I checked out your link it wasn't open for guests and now I'm happy it is. I can see how can be terribly helpful using complice full stack, but even as guest, it is still pretty functional and nice. Well done ;)

Let us know your findings!

Done :)

EDIT: and +1 to everyone. It took me more doing that than the survey :|

Link?

Just release it as what it is now. Pretty please.

Yeah, but the weak point is how to realize that a model switching is needed in that very moment.

We are out of it, so we can bitch about ;-).

What happened to the intent of this post? Do you still need proofreaders? Count me in, in that case.

I've had more flashes of awareness, seeing myself running mechanical patterns during times I normally wouldn't have noticed them. Briefly, here and there. I've been sometimes able to radically course correct and do something entirely different. Othertimes, I try and fail to do something different.

Has happened to me different times and I tried to achive that presence of mind more consistently. Obviously, that it's not even far easy: my current approach is to use this approach and my results are inconsistent. But I'm keeping track on those moments, maybe I'll get some results in the long run.

links are dead!

I truly hope you are not right about what you have written. I found it really plausible. Frightening plausible.

He's right, as far as I studied.

ehm , man: Soter is ancient greek and it was used by medieval erudite scholar, yes, but to refer, in a more or less cryptic way, only to Jchrist.

Premise: I've studied latin for about 5 years, so I'm not going to use gTranslate for Latin :)

my dictionary sounds better for this scope.

• Verb:

The verb prodeo [pro-eo] is the best I could think.

• the particle pro- means something like in front of, even between (me) and something, or near (me): this last one is peculiar and happens only sometimes.

• eo is the most common and even one of the ancient verbs (that's why is defective/irregular) that means simply go.

So when Cicero (Br. 39) said :

prodire in lucem

he probably meant something like

com... (read more)

fluo and its derived verbs (like ad-fluo -> affluo) refer mainly to a liquid that flows. I don't think is the more appropriate. Edit: also pileus is a different hat: it is the one used by ex-slaves to mark their acquired freedom. It was high and conic, only made by wool, with no brim. (I know they are nitpicking but maybe they could improve the book and could help sound more professional)