AlainCo
-18
2
AlainCo has not written any posts yet.
Interesting article, but far from reality.
Compared to most article you cover a much wider scope of what is happening in science, but you miss most of what is happening industrially.
My point of view is that we are in a cas of paradigm change in nuclear energy, like the one Thomas Kuhn studied in "the structure of scientifc revolution".
That theory is clearly explaining why LENr is rejected. In such transition the old-school community choose the evidence that "are acceptable" so thet their position stay winning. IT IS IMPOSSIBLe TO CONVINCE WITH EVIDENCES. thait is a conclusion of Thosma Kuhn. Beside some More than Iwamura and toyota , moe than NASA GRC 89/2008 (and... (read 372 more words →)
note that there have been answers to those claims http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/35/SR35905nrl2009.shtml
the theory of the magic tweezer look more like a conspiracy-style claim...
more stange it seems that that US team bashed the result, claimed contamination of the lab, that strangely does not contaminate the blank samples... more that that, the contamination have been checked by another team and they found nothing...
some conspiracy lover, and some business experts, just think about a manipulation to bash a competitor...
abyway Iwamura is not the bes evdence, there are tritium evidence in US and at BARC, He4/heat correlation at ENEA, and what I love the most is the ENEA paper at ICCF15 that show that cristallography structure of the surface determinate the probability of anomalous heat...
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?616-ENEA-paper-ICCF15-(2009)-Cristallography-conditions&highlight=enea+cristallography