How does a Living Being solve the problem of Subsystem Alignment?
So, a Living Being is composed of multiple parts who act pretty much on tandem except extreme situations like Cancer, how does that work?
So, a Living Being is composed of multiple parts who act pretty much on tandem except extreme situations like Cancer, how does that work?
Most Quantum Mechanics are formulated from a point of view of Causal Decission Theory, as can be seen from the Noncontextuality/counterfactual indefiniteness of Kochen-Specker Theorem. Now, this creates a chatastrophe when the Observator needs to be analized through a physical lense. That is, Self-Measurement is terribly paradoxical. Things go so...
So, a Living Being is composed of multiple parts who act pretty much on tandem except extreme situations like Cancer, how does that work?
Sure, it is fine!! I imagine that is a high problem. As a physicist, although not someone in quantum mechanics, I tried to be precise.
Anyway, your answer has been good. It seems as the paper has been debunked.
And do problems also do not arise with Albert self-measurement in "The quantum mechanics of self–measurement"?
Thank you a lot!! It is useful!
Is it forbidden to ask about Quantum Mechanics and Decission Theory? I got banned with the other account and I don't understand why. It was a serious question.
Most Quantum Mechanics are formulated from a point of view of Causal Decission Theory, as can be seen from the Noncontextuality/counterfactual indefiniteness of Kochen-Specker Theorem.
Now, this creates a chatastrophe when the Observator needs to be analized through a physical lense. That is, Self-Measurement is terribly paradoxical.
Things go so badly that one needs to conclude that the following axiom is incompatible with the Law of Noncontradiction and Quantum Mechanics. According to Frauchiger and Renner:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6143649/
Suppose that agent A has established that
Statement A(i): “I am certain that agent A′, upon reasoning within the same theory as the one I am using, is certain that x = ξ at time t.”
Then agent A can conclude that
Statement A(ii): “I