EDIT: The original post now has updated times and links, so refer to that instead.
Here are links to the times suggested, for convenience:
I'd suggest posting meeting times using timeanddate.com, to help avoid confusion about time zones and daylight savings.
Perhaps what is missing is these rules:
AT = A (1)
AF = F (2)
A + T = T (3)
A + F = A (4)
Which can be derived from the given axioms, apparently. I'm not sure if some necessary axioms were omitted.
Using some of these, here's one way to derive B!A=!A from !B=AD:
!B = AD
!B + A = AD + A
!B + A = AD + AT (1)
!B + A = A(D + T) (Distributivity)
!B + A = AT (3)
!B + A = A (1)
!!B!A = !A (Duality)
B!A = !A
Post also mentioned Tolerate Tolerance
I registered and started posting a while back, but since then have reverted to lurking. Partly due to not having time, but I can also identify with reasons some others have given.
Voted down for being off-topic.
Verifying a proof is quite a bit simpler that coming up with the proof in the first place.
Perhaps keep anonymous votes too, but make them worth less or only use them to break ties.
A sequence of wins and non-wins is enough to tell you whether a given approach can result in intelligent behaviour. That alone is enough to make it a useful experiment.
A man with one watch might have the wrong time; a man with two watches is more aware of his own ignorance.