I really like this idea and I've been enjoying using the site!
I have noticed, however, that some of the questions include how they were resolved in the description. This is not a huge issue given that the system depends on self-regulation and there is already a mechanism for skipping questions for which users have prior knowledge. That said, it was confusing when I saw the question below because I thought "if the resolution of the forecast is embedded in the description, it would be silly to include it in the question set. Therefore it must not actually be giving me information about how the question resolved."
This only happened for 2 out of the 30 questions I looked at, but it seems like something that people should be aware of.
I really like this idea and I've been enjoying using the site!
I have noticed, however, that some of the questions include how they were resolved in the description. This is not a huge issue given that the system depends on self-regulation and there is already a mechanism for skipping questions for which users have prior knowledge. That said, it was confusing when I saw the question below because I thought "if the resolution of the forecast is embedded in the description, it would be silly to include it in the question set. Therefore it must not actually be giving me information about how the question resolved."
This only happened for 2 out of the 30 questions I looked at, but it seems like something that people should be aware of.