User Profile

star0
description14
message139

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Personal Blogposts
personPersonal blogposts by LessWrong users (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

Meetup : Seattle Rationality Reading Group

2y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Seattle Rationality Reading Group: 109-114

2y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (76-80)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (71-75)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (65-70)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (62-66)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (57-61)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Rationality Reading Group (updated)

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Seattle Sequences Group: Mysterious Answers 5

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Seattle Sequences group: Mysterious Answers 4

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Recent Comments

Moderately true of Seattle as well (two group houses, plus some people living as housemates or whatever but not explicitly a Rationalist Group House). I'm not sure if our community is big enough for something like this but I love this idea and it would be a point in favor of moving the bay area if t...(read more)

Hell, it's not even just the bay area; Seattle has two explicitly-rationalist-group-houses and plenty of other people who live in more "normal" situations but with other rationalists (I found my current flatmate, when my old one moved out, through the community). Certainly the bay area rationalist c...(read more)

Gah, thank you, edited. Markdown is my nemesis.

Agreed that the above won't work for all people, not even all people who say > I haven't and probably can't internalize it on a very deep, systematic level, no matter how many times I re-read the articles

Nonetheless, I find it a useful thing to cons...(read more)

For what it's worth, I got relatively little[1] out of reading the Sequences solo, in any form (and RAZ is worse than LW in this regard, because the comments were worth something even on really old and inactive threads, and surprisingly many threads were still active when I first joined the site in ...(read more)

I don't think "converse" is the word you're looking for here - possibly "complement" or "negation" in the sense that (A || ~A) is true for all A - but I get what you're saying. Converse might even be the right word for that; vocabulary is not my forte.

If you take the statement "most beliefs are fa...(read more)

Replying loooong after the fact (as you did, for that matter) but I think that's exactly the problem that the post is talking about. In logical terms, one can define a category "human" such that it carries an implication "mortal", but if one does that, one can't add things to this category until det...(read more)

Agreed. "Torture" as a concept doesn't describe any particular experience, so you can't put a specific pain level to it. Waterboarding puts somebody in fear for their life and evokes very well-ingrained terror triggers in our brain, but doesn't really involve pain (to the best of my knowledge). Bran...(read more)

I haven't investigated selling it, but up to a certain multiple of my annual salary it's included in my benefits and there is no value in setting it lower than that value; I wouldn't get any extra money.

This is a fairly standard benefit from tech companies (and others that have good benefits packa...(read more)

Nitpick: The article talks about a rabbit kidney, not a mouse one

It also isn't entirely clear how cold the kidney got, or how long it was stored. It's evidence in favor of "at death" cryonics, but I'm not sure how strong of evidence it is. Also, it's possible to survive with substantially more ki...(read more)

Many employers provide life insurance. I've always thought that was kind of weird (but then, all of life insurance is weird; it's more properly "death insurance" anyhow) but it's a think. My current employer provides (at no cost to me) a life insurance policy sufficient to pay for cryonics. It would...(read more)