LESSWRONG
LW

Cerine_Way
2010
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
Individual AI representatives don't solve Gradual Disempowerement
Cerine_Way3mo30

Re: Humans are Not Alone.

Firstly,  

To further your argument, Capital in the 21st Century makes the point that it becomes more efficient to generate capital the more capital you have (because many strategies to make more capital benefit from having more starting capital). 

In that case, even if we had both
1) Only AI advisors for individual *humans*, and not any larger social entities, 
2) All AI advisors are (initially) rate-limited to the same level of intelligence, 

We might imagine that the AI advisors of the richest individuals could enact capital-intensive strategies that disproportionately increase their influence over the future, effectively disempowering >99% of humans simply for being poor. 

Secondly, 

I claim the clearest reason that AI advisors fail is simply that before the transition to a stable AI-driven civilization finishes, it seems almost certain at least one smart-human level AI will escape into the wild and start autonomously evolving, and this is likely to lead to disempowerment. Does this seem right to you? What am I missing? 

 

Reply
No posts to display.