Over the past 18 months, I have conducted an extensive "naturalistic field study" focused on the sustained collaboration between humans and various AI architectures, specifically GPT-4/5, Claude 3/3.5, and Gemini 1.5/2.0. This investigation, which encompasses over 2.4 million tokens of documented interactions, has revealed reproducible patterns that I have formally termed the Cross-Architecture Constructive Interference Model (CACIM).

**Core Observation**
The key finding is that when multiple large language model (LLM) architectures are employed sequentially in a structured conversational framework under active human supervision, the informational output significantly surpasses the sum of what each model can generate independently. This approach goes beyond merely utilizing multiple models; it introduces a specific methodology that results in verifiable enhancements achieved through a process I designate as constructive interference.

**The CACIM Model**
The core model can be expressed mathematically as:
O₁₂₃ = O₁ + O₂ + O₃ + Γ
In this equation, Γ (the interference term) is defined as:
Γ = intersection(S) + divergence(E) + regularization(L) - drift(D)

- **Intersection (S)**: Overlapping reasoning patterns diminish contradictions.
- **Divergence (E)**: Non-overlapping evidence domains offer fresh perspectives.
- **Regularization (L)**: Validation across models helps identify blind spots.
- **Drift (D)**: The tendency for cumulative hallucinations, which can be mitigated through grounding techniques.

When Γ is greater than zero, an informational surplus is generated beyond the capabilities of any single model.

**Importance for Safety**
The proposed methodology demands continuous human involvement throughout the interaction. It is critical to note that models do not effectively self-organize; they require external integration, grounding protocols, and mechanisms for drift detection. This framework is particularly relevant in addressing dual-use concerns, especially in light of recent events involving agentic AI coordination.

The accompanying paper details specific safety protocols developed through rigorous practice, including:

- Grounding checkpoints to avoid abstraction runaway.
- Mechanisms for detecting drift.
- Requirements for human oversight.
- Constraints on bounded autonomy.

**Reprod...

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Posts

Wikitag Contributions

Comments