No posts to display.
> That having been established, what could it mean to say that my judgment is a "mistake"? That seems to be a category error. One can't be mistaken in wanting something.
I have never used the word "mistake" by itself. I did say that refusing to become orgasmium is a *hedonistic utilitarian mistake*...(read more)
In this case: letting bias and/or intellectual laziness dominate your decision-making process.
I'm not arguing that people shouldn't decide that. I'm not arguing any kind of "should."
I'm just saying, if you do decide that, you're kind of dumb. And by analogy Eliezer was being kind of dumb in his article.
Interesting stuff. Very interesting.
Do you buy it?
That article is arguing that it's all right to value things that aren't mental states over a net gain in mental utility. If, for instance, you're given the choice between *feeling like* you've made lots of scientific discoveries and *actually ...(read more)
This may be a minor nit, but... is this forum collectively anti-orgasmium, now?
Because being orgasmium is *by definition* more pleasant than not being orgasmium. Refusing to become orgasmium is a hedonistic utilitarian mistake, full stop. (Well, that's not actually true, since as a human you ca...(read more)
I don't think his explanation for why a chair pushes back on your hand is quite right, either. I've mostly been told that material solidness comes from the Pauli exclusion principle, not electrostatic repulsion.
I don't know quantum mechanics, so I don't have a good perspective on the problem, but ...(read more)