Strong +1 to this
I'm also happy to discuss stuff about norms further 1 on 1 -- the best way to contact me, anonymously or non-anonymously, is through this short form.
Just want to preemptively flag that in the EA biosecurity community we follow a general norm against brainstorming novel ways to cause harm with biology. Basic reasoning is that succeeding in this task ≈ generating info hazards.
Abstractly postulating a hypothetical virus with high virulence + transmissibility and a long latent period can be useful for facilitating thinking, but brainstorming the specifics of how to actually accomplish this -- as some folks in these and some nearby comments are trending in the direction of starting to do -- poses risks that exceed the likely benefits.
Happy to discuss further if interested, feel free to DM me.
Yep, that's right -- thanks for clarifying!