The French academic in question reads LessWrong ! And agreed, but I would put it in these terms:
(i) AI will increase the number and scope of disputes;
(ii) Judiciaries will need to cope with this, and they have two main tools (leaving aside "more resources"): (a) add frictions (temporal, formal, technical - you'd have to find a way to ration it); or (b) use AI.
(iii) (b) is limited by legitimacy (people don't want an AI judge), but it's less often-noticed that (a) is too ! When suits take years, or when your complaint is rejected because you did not use the... (read more)
The French academic in question reads LessWrong ! And agreed, but I would put it in these terms:
(i) AI will increase the number and scope of disputes;
(ii) Judiciaries will need to cope with this, and they have two main tools (leaving aside "more resources"): (a) add frictions (temporal, formal, technical - you'd have to find a way to ration it); or (b) use AI.
(iii) (b) is limited by legitimacy (people don't want an AI judge), but it's less often-noticed that (a) is too ! When suits take years, or when your complaint is rejected because you did not use the... (read more)