I am provoked by the 'wins outright' assertion -- 'Many-worlds wins outright given our current state of evidence.' If we were do something along the lines of devising an experiment that shows how Many-worlds is empirically distinguishable from other interpretations, well, I'm impressed. But it hasn't happened yet. Also, 'quantum non-realism appears to be a huge bluff', well, but what of other worlds that we can never observe? Infinite other worlds, this one seems about as 'huge', at least, as I can imagine. But also, invisible.
And I muse about the phrase 'just flatly wrong as probability theory'. I muse, that maybe you mean '*probably* wrong'? Seems apt, if we are offering this... (read 356 more words →)
I am provoked by the 'wins outright' assertion -- 'Many-worlds wins outright given our current state of evidence.' If we were do something along the lines of devising an experiment that shows how Many-worlds is empirically distinguishable from other interpretations, well, I'm impressed. But it hasn't happened yet. Also, 'quantum non-realism appears to be a huge bluff', well, but what of other worlds that we can never observe? Infinite other worlds, this one seems about as 'huge', at least, as I can imagine. But also, invisible.
And I muse about the phrase 'just flatly wrong as probability theory'. I muse, that maybe you mean '*probably* wrong'? Seems apt, if we are offering this... (read 356 more words →)