User Profile

star37
description25
message3053

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
All Posts
personIncludes personal and meta blogposts (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

On not diversifying charity

4y
5 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
73

Life hack request: I want to want to work.

5y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
53

Trust in God, or, The Riddle of Kyon Fan Visual Novel

5y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
9

How do you not be a hater?

5y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
20

Timeless Physics Question

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
30

Yet another Sleeping Beauty

7y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
25

Felicifia: a Utilitarianism Forum

7y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
21

Yehweh and the Methods of Rationality

7y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
30

Looking for proof of conditional probability

7y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
33

Against improper priors

7y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
20

Recent Comments

Kind of reminds me of a discussion of making a utilitarian emblem on felicifia.org. We never really settled on anything, but I think the best one was Σ☺.

Alternately, learn to upload people. Which is still probably going to require nanotech. This way, you're not dependent on ecosystems because you don't need anything organic. You can also modify computers to be resistant to radiation more easily than you can people.

If we can't thrive on a wrecked E...(read more)

I admit that a Dyson sphere seems like an arbitrary place to stop, but I think my basic argument stands either way. If any intelligent life was that common, some of it would spread.

And that's why my conclusion is "that wasn't made by aliens."

But that's just the prior probability. I can still say that we have strong evidence that the probability of a given solar system having intelligent life is much, much lower than one in 150,000.

> They're in that interval, or there isn't easy space travel.

But that's a lot of information. It's a very short interval. Since it's so unlikely to be in that interval, this is large evidence against easy space travel.

> We can argue it's unlikely, sure

It's a probabilistic argument. But what i...(read more)

According to Wikipedia, in Malaysia sale and importation of sex toys is illegal, but it doesn't sound like there's any law against using a vibrator you made yourself.

But if those are aliens, then aliens must be common. And if aliens are common, then there should have been tons of them that got to the space travel point long enough ago to have reached us by now.

But how often does that have to happen? They only looked at about 150,000 stars. There are hundreds of billions in our galaxy alone, and if alien civilization developed even 1% earlier than ours, they'd have had time to colonize the entire Virgo supercluster, so long as they start near the center.

basically a negative income tax for the working poor in the US

That would increase incentive to work for the poor, but decrease the incentive to work hard enough to stop being considered poor. They can't have the income tax be negative for everyone.