LESSWRONG
LW

David Hugh-Jones
46121450
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

My book is out! https://www.amazon.co.uk/Wyclifs-Dust-Western-cultures-printing/dp/B0B5PPXSQH/

I'm a social scientist in an economics department in Britain. Two of my interests are experimental economics and the social causes of genetic variation. I have a newsletter at https://wyclif.substack.com.

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
Ordinary human life
David Hugh-Jones1y10

Lots of people never face cancer and they seem pretty human. Why would it be different if nobody ever faced cancer? Why wasn't it different when people stopped facing starvation, or rickets?

Reply
How to Convince my Son that Drugs are Bad
Answer by David Hugh-JonesDec 17, 20224647

A little meta-advice... you're in a weird community – not nec bad, but quite unusual – and one that is far from guaranteed to have a high level of experience and expertise with childrearing. But yet also, one that is quite likely to confidently express numerous opinions on the topic.

Reply
Self-Control Secrets of the Puritan Masters
David Hugh-Jones3y00

I understand your point. Probably I'm overestimating. Which quotes were hard? I'm guessing that e.g. “the commandement, or example of our superiours” and “grant [sin] but her little, and this little will quickly come to a great deale” are relatively clear.

Reading C17 English isn't hard to learn: it's modern English (not Middle or Old) but just in an antiquated style and sometimes words have different shades of meaning. By "not hard" I mean you can teach yourself, simply by reading stuff and picking it up as you go along - I did Shakespeare at school, then Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Treatises on Liberty. (I wouldn't start with Puritan self-help literature!) It's worthwhile, because you get access to a bunch of people who thought in ways very different to your own time. That helps you surmount historical parochialism (https://wyclif.substack.com/p/parochialism-in-time-and-space).

Reply
A market is a neural network
David Hugh-Jones3y30

There are definitely differences. One is that NNs are trained on training data and then let loose on real world (or testing) data. Markets are always training online. Another is that NNs (are supposed to) approximate a true hidden function, whereas markets are adapting to changing conditions not necessarily to a single underlying truth. But markets do adapt to inputs they haven't seen before, and there are economic theories describing that process, like adaptive expectations and tatonnement. I suspect that markets are more likely to adjust quite quickly, and also to "forget" old data quite quickly.

Reply
A market is a neural network
David Hugh-Jones3y10

Thank you! Yes, this guy adds details.

Reply
A review of Nate Hilger's The Parent Trap
David Hugh-Jones3y20

Also, the nuclear family is absurd and unnatural, and we evolved to be raised by entire communities, not just by one mother and maybe one father. With too few adult caretakers, of course outcomes will be far worse.

Citation needed. Parents are biologically related to their children. Entire communities are not. Is there any evidence that humans have any evolved characteristics which make the nuclear family worse than community upbringing?

Reply
A review of Nate Hilger's The Parent Trap
David Hugh-Jones3y21

I think almost everyone (who isn't daft) accepts IQ is partly genetic - and the author does too. But the question is whether there's a gene-environment interaction in parenting styles, which is slightly different.

Reply
On effective altruism, utilitarianism and localness
David Hugh-Jones3y30

So the argument is based on substitutability. If you don't do (global good thing X) - and if it is truly important - someone else probably will.

Reply
An academic journal is just a Twitter feed
David Hugh-Jones3y30

That is true, but I also think journal editors will internalize that. And it's easy to fetishize this stuff – electronic formats die out, so let's engrave all our journals on stone tablets! – but arguably, any important article exists in 50 versions on the web, and will eventually be preserved, so long as anyone cares about it. At least, that seems to have happened so far.

Reply
The internet makes it easier to cooperate, that’s the problem
David Hugh-Jones3y40

I think that's a weird take. A cooperation game typically has actions where you lose, but others gain more (whatever actions others take). Prisoner's Dilemmas and public goods games are simple examples. The only wrinkle is "what counts as more" if you take seriously the idea that utility is non-comparable across persons. But a weaker criterion is just "everyone would be better off if everyone cooperated", which again the PD and public goods games satisfy.

Reply
Load More
6Why I am not a polygenic score nihilist
8d
0
13Five toy worlds to think about heritability
1y
0
24Ordinary human life
3y
3
67Self-Control Secrets of the Puritan Masters
3y
3
7A market is a neural network
3y
4
9Wyclif's Dust: the missing chapter
3y
0
15A review of Nate Hilger's The Parent Trap
3y
8
14On effective altruism, utilitarianism and localness
3y
2
14An academic journal is just a Twitter feed
3y
4
54The internet makes it easier to cooperate, that’s the problem
3y
9
Load More