It sounds like Cicero competes to win against other players who are trying to satisfy other human goals ingrained by evolution. Does not seem very fair.
Do we know to what extent top-rated players actually try to win in this anonymized no-stakes setting, as opposed to trying to signal qualities that we evolved to want to signal in non-anonymized ancestral environment?
It sounds like Cicero competes to win against other players who are trying to satisfy other human goals ingrained by evolution. Does not seem very fair.
Do we know to what extent top-rated players actually try to win in this anonymized no-stakes setting, as opposed to trying to signal qualities that we evolved to want to signal in non-anonymized ancestral environment?